🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold move to ban social networking access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves around the globe. Lawmakers, campaigners, and families are observing with great interest to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for other nations.

The European Trend

In Europe, a increasing group of states are moving toward similar restrictions.

• Denmark has announced a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister arguing that phones and networks are "stealing our youngsters' childhood". A law is expected to be formalized next year.
• Norway is set to implement a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard the young from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is introducing a online verification tool to authenticate the user details of social media account holders. Officials have indicated that an similar ban remains "a potential measures in reserve".
• In Spain, the president has called on parliament to approve a proposal lifting the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has endorsed a similar step, including an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in The Netherlands has recommended families to prevent their children from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has passed a advisory motion calling for a ban for minors unless a parent decides otherwise is given. Although it warns of the "habit-forming" design of these services, the step does not establish binding law.

"A strong age limit is a good foundation," commented a leading MEP behind the resolution.

The UK: A Watchful Approach

Across Britain, the leadership has kept open a possible ban, arguing that "no measure is off the table" but insisting any decision must be "supported by strong research".

Previously, momentum grew behind a bill to introduce restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately watered down. Nonetheless, the government committed to investigate the matter.

Campaign organizations have voiced concerns. One foundation founded by the loved ones of a girl who died after viewing disturbing platform posts argues that a simple age ban could fail to protect children and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of risk when teens reach the legal age.

"This ban is a response to the inability of the Silicon Valley to create tools that are safe and suitable for young users," stated a leading child protection advocate.

The United States: A Fragmented Approach

In the United States, action is largely occurring at the state government level amid national inaction.

• Utah mandates adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and controls late-night use.
• Florida has signed a bill prohibiting children under fourteen from joining social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a rule limiting teenagers to a single hour of social media use per day, with any further access needing adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly passed measures demanding guardian approval for minors to create social media profiles.

Despite bipartisan support and calls from certain politicians to follow this example, a federal ban is currently seen as unlikely.

Global Views

Beyond these regions, additional nations are also taking action.

• Malaysia plans to restrict social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• Brazil has raised the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, international bodies strike a more nuanced position. A major UN agency has advised that social media bans carry risks and "might have unintended consequences". The agency points out that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable children and that bans should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to prioritize child safeguards.

While this global debate continues, the policies of the Australian government and others demonstrate that policymakers internationally are increasingly content to wait for the industry to act voluntarily.